How it works

Follow the review from source to decision

OptiView’s intended workflow brings project evidence, takeoff questions and human decisions into one review process. Here is the experience we are developing for flooring preconstruction teams.

Construction floor plans on a job-site table, marked up with red pencil revision clouds beside a tape measure and a room finish schedule.Field / the review desk
  1. Step 01 / 05

    Confirm what governs the review

    Start with the project package, applicable drawings, scope notes and review standards. Establish the governing revision and keep missing or unresolved information visible. The reviewer needs to know what they are checking against.

  2. Step 02 / 05

    Review the takeoff in context

    Bring supported takeoff evidence into the review. Inspect quantities, material assignments and scope questions alongside the relevant source references. File support and output requirements will be confirmed as part of evaluating a team’s workflow.

  3. Step 03 / 05

    Turn questions into clear findings

    Record what needs attention and the evidence behind it. Make the next action understandable to the person responsible for the correction. Keep uncertainty visible until a qualified person resolves it.

  4. Step 04 / 05

    Verify the returned correction

    Connect the returned version to the original finding. A reviewer checks whether the issue has been resolved and records that decision. The correction history remains part of the review record.

  5. Step 05 / 05

    Approve the reviewed version

    An authorized senior reviewer assesses the current version and remaining exceptions. Approval belongs to that specific reviewed version. Engineering review remains distinct from pricing, commercial approval and bid submission.

Worked example

What a review finding needs to show

Illustrative example using fictional project information

A-201 / REV B — HARBOR EXCHANGE, LEVEL 1101102SHEET VINYL103104CORRIDOR105 / OPEN OFFICE106CORE

Source reference

Sheet A-201 • Room 102 • Revision B

Scope note N-4
“Resilient wall base: 4″ rubber, continuous at all resilient flooring.”
Finish legend
“RB-1 — 4″ vinyl cove base (typical at corridors).”

The reviewer checks items against the governing revision — here, Revision B of sheet A-201.

The example shows the intended review structure, not a live customer project or automated accuracy result.

Discuss your workflow

Share a little about your workflow so we can have a useful conversation about OptiView’s direction and future evaluation opportunities.